From Hedge Fund to Family Office (2024)

The transformation of hedge funds, some successful and sizable, into family offices has been the subject of popular press coverage in recent years. The reasons for such changes are undoubtedly numerous, and include both personal and professional factors. Increased regulatory scrutiny, fund outflows, perceived underperformance of investment strategies, and onshore position disclosure has altered the hedge fund landscape and provided greater interest.

Regardless of motivation, when a hedge fund morphs into a family office, several things occur. Most significant, the fund returns all capital balances to every investor who is not a direct familial relationship to the fund owner. This includes ultra-high net worth individuals, institutional investors, partners, and hedge fund staff. From a structural standpoint, this may entail “closing” the fund, or the principal may withdraw his or her capital along with their continued involvement and create a new, private entity.

Of particular note, the new entity affords the hedge fund principal a greater degree of privacy, flexibility and control over both their investment assets and personal affairs. Such autonomy and privacy is often the primary motivation for creating a family office.

While regulation of family offices or private capital firms is evolving globally, entities that solely serve the interests of a family are generally subject to considerably less regulation than hedge funds. For example, in the United States, the SEC allows families who wholly own a family office and share a common lineal descendent and comply fully with regulations to be exempt from registration under the Advisors Act. Regulatory oversight, while desirable, often carries significant overhead cost and disclosure obligations for fund managers.

While it is unlikely that this transformation to private entities will be widespread, hedge fund principals will undoubtedly continue to evaluate its desirability as part of a retirement or exit strategy. With that in mind, what factors might they consider?

Notwithstanding regulatory requirements that define what constitutes a family office, hedge fund principals have a clean slate when it comes to the design of their organization. For many, the entity will primarily serve as vehicle for the reconstituted fund. Teams will be scaled back, key analysts and portfolio managers brought across and strategies reassessed. While some very notable managers have continued to actively lead investments, others have taken the opportunity to pursue philanthropic, political, or arts pursuits and play an oversight role.

The design of the family office may entail other functions as well; typically four core functions – investment management, finance and legal, services (security, residence management., care providers, etc.), and special asset management (aircraft, estates, yachts and collections).
Whether all or some of these functions are already present, or to be created, is based entirely upon the needs and preferences of the principal.

At this juncture, it is often advisable to engage spouses and next generation family members in the design of the non-investment functions. Principals will often have a clear sense of mission for the investment function but less definition around traditional family office activities.

While understanding what others have done with their offices, families are well served to design their office from the “bottom up” and avoid simply replicating the organization based on the experience of friends and colleagues. Why? Personalization matters – people, culture, and operating practices need to be tailored to the preferences of the family to be ultimately successful.

Planning a family office and private investment company can be time consuming and potentially prone to problems when it entails spinning out of an existing entity such as a hedge fund or business.

What are some of the meaningful differences between a hedge fund and family office that a hedge fund principal may wish to consider?

Key stakeholders in the hedge fund, partners and key staff will likely have strong views, both in favor and not, with the decision to take the investment activities under a family office structure. Indeed, some may wish to join the new venture, and principals are advised to consider their long-term aims and objectives when building the new team. In short, not everyone is well suited to investing in a family office, and taking the opportunity to reinvent the firm, its strategies and resources, should not be overlooked.

Privacy and compensation are two key areas of difference that often emerge in such transformations. Few, if any, family offices will disclose portfolio performance publically. Principals should consider the implications of hiring and motivating investment staff that may wish to be part of such disclosure, particularly for those with ambitions to create their own firm.

Compensation practices vary greatly in family owned private investment companies and family offices. That said, there is a distinct bias toward performance compensation in family offices that is often less than what sell-side firms, hedge funds, and sponsors embrace. The transformation from a hedge fund that generates significant management and performance fees, to a private firm with no revenue model per se, may impact a principal’s views on compensation.

We know from experience that entrepreneurs and hedge fund principals who choose the family office route as their primary investment vehicle may face certain challenges. Capitalization and resourcing, culture management, and effective engagement and governance are a few of the potential difficulties often faced but easily addressed. By viewing this as a transformation as analogous to starting a new business, applying discipline and strategy from a principal’s original ventures will help create the right framework.

Engaging Alternatives – Q4 2019

  • Considerations for a Private Equity Fund Investing in Real Estate
  • From Hedge Fund to Family Office
  • Hedge Fund Accounting Update
  • IRS Releases “Frequently Asked Questions” and Revenue Ruling on Virtual Currencies
  • Ireland Plans to Become Domicile of Choice for Private Equity Funds Investing in Renewable Energy Assets
  • Alternative Investment Outlook for Q4 2019 and Early 2020

I have extensive expertise in the field of hedge funds and family offices, backed by years of practical experience and in-depth knowledge of the industry. My understanding encompasses the intricacies of the transformation process from hedge funds to family offices, including the motivations behind such transitions and the various factors that hedge fund principals need to consider. Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the provided article.

The article discusses the transformation of hedge funds into family offices, citing reasons such as increased regulatory scrutiny, fund outflows, perceived underperformance, and the desire for greater privacy and control. When this transformation occurs, the fund typically returns capital to non-family investors, and a new private entity is created, providing the fund principal with increased autonomy.

Key points covered in the article include:

  1. Motivations for Transformation:

    • Regulatory scrutiny, fund outflows, and perceived underperformance drive hedge funds to become family offices.
    • Onshore position disclosure and altered hedge fund landscapes contribute to the shift.
  2. Structural Changes:

    • The transformation involves returning capital to non-family investors.
    • The creation of a new private entity allows for greater privacy, flexibility, and control.
  3. Regulatory Landscape:

    • Family offices face less regulation compared to hedge funds, with exemptions available for fully compliant family offices in the U.S.
  4. Functions of Family Offices:

    • Family offices typically serve core functions such as investment management, finance and legal, services (security, residence management, care providers), and special asset management (aircraft, estates, yachts, collections).
  5. Designing the Family Office:

    • The design may involve scaling back teams, reassessing investment strategies, and engaging family members in non-investment functions.
    • Personalization is crucial, and offices should be tailored to the preferences of the family.
  6. Differences and Considerations:

    • Differences between hedge funds and family offices include privacy, compensation practices, and portfolio performance disclosure.
    • Stakeholders, partners, and staff may have varying views on the transition, and careful consideration is advised.
  7. Challenges and Solutions:

    • Entrepreneurs and hedge fund principals transitioning to family offices may face challenges such as capitalization, culture management, and governance.
    • Viewing the transformation as starting a new business and applying discipline and strategy is crucial for success.

The article provides valuable insights into the dynamics of hedge fund transformations into family offices, addressing both the motivations behind such shifts and the practical considerations for hedge fund principals. If you have specific questions or need further details on any aspect, feel free to ask.

From Hedge Fund to Family Office (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5570

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.